Talk:Lunarcrete

Untitled
A Google search reveals no use of the Lunarcrete associated with Beyer, but it does show the word as the name of a company. Delete? JamesBWatson (talk) 16:43, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I have nominated it for AfD. See Articles for deletion/Lunarcrete. A  v  N  17:01, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Added new section on Sulfur based waterless concrete
Just to say I added this section and the next one. Seemed likely to be totally non controversial to add this so just went ahead and following "be bold" added it to the article. I couldn't find much about it here in wikipedia except the article on Sulfur concrete. Robert Walker (talk) 16:48, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed merge of AstroCrete into Lunarcrete
AstroCrete does not appear to be sufficiently and instead could simply be a section in Lunarcrete Polyamorph (talk) 08:57, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Proposed Merge of AstroCrete into Lunarcrete (2)
AstroCrete does not appear to be have sufficient independent notability and could instead be dealt with in a section in the existing article Lunarcrete. The previous merge proposal received zero comments and was closed as no consensus so I am re-listing and posting at relevant wikiprojects to attract some comments from interested editors. Polyamorph (talk) 08:30, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose, the sourced AstroCrete page is a specific form of lunar material, not an overall view of the topic. Have added it as a 'See also'. Randy Kryn (talk) 09:05, 10 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Weak oppose, they're different materials. It could use some cleanup however as the page seems to be in the style of an academic paper instead of an article. Nigos (talk c) 04:46, 15 December 2021 (UTC) Support, not really notable, it’s best to be in a subsection Nigos (talk | contribs) 23:18, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 * They're both formed from regolith. It just seems "Astrocrete" contains human blood/urea as a binding agent. Polyamorph (talk) 18:30, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Guess you’re right, I’ve changed it to support Nigos (talk | contribs) 23:18, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Support Astrocrete comes after lunacrete, since a lunar base is the most probable first base on a planet. I would put the Astrocrete as a subsection into the lunar version.--Geysirhead (talk) 16:57, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

I have now had chance to read and do agree on balance that a merger might be best. SUPPORT GRALISTAIR (talk) 15:05, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Done--Geysirhead (talk) 17:32, 11 June 2022 (UTC)