Talk:Lustig-Prean and Beckett v United Kingdom

Biography
This material is not appropriate for the article. If the anonymous user who is so interested in Lustig-Prean continues to put it back in, I'll escalate this further. Mhardcastle (talk) 09:18, 1 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Mhardcastle, having looked back over the edit history of this article, you are right about irrelevant biographical information cluttering it up; at times this article has looked more like (self-?)promotion instead of an encyclopaedia. It is also important that the legal facts are recorded accurately: have therefore copy edited article for accuracy (ECHR did not consider Article 14 aspects).  Removed yet more bio info that is not relevant to this case.  Moreover, the case concerned two individuals, not one, as the language of previous versions tends to imply; Beckett was mentioned in the case title, but that was all!  Added in-line citation to the ECHR judgement as published, where the facts of this important case speak for themselves.  More work is needed to improve this article, but it shouldn't be used for WP:SOAP. Accurate law (talk) 23:06, 31 March 2011 (UTC)