Talk:Máni/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

I am reviewing this article. Cirt (talk) 09:58, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Successful good article nomination
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of December 17, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:


 * 1. Well written?: Written in clear and understandable wording. Good structure and flow. Passes here.
 * 2. Factually accurate?: Duly cited throughout to WP:RS/WP:V secondary sources. Passes here.
 * 3. Broad in coverage?: The size of the article is short, but it covers the different areas of the subject matter. I especially liked the Theories subsection, which could possibly be expanded upon further in the future with analysis from other secondary sources. Passes here.
 * 4. Neutral point of view?: Written in a neutral tone. Passes here.
 * 5. Article stability?


 * Article edit history: Inspection of the article's edit history reveals no issues or problems going back several months.
 * Talk page edit history: No real activity to speak of here.
 * Passes here.
 * 6. Images?: Three free-use images used in this article, two from Wikimedia Commons, the last one is okay for en.wiki but needs further investigation if it is okay on Commons:


 * File:Máni and Sól by Lorenz Frølich.jpg
 * File:The Wolves Pursuing Sol and Mani.jpg
 * File:Far away and long ago by Willy Pogany.png
 * Review of the individual image pages checks out okay. Passes here.

If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations. — Cirt (talk) 10:07, 17 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for taking the time to review this! bloodofox: (talk) 11:08, 17 December 2008 (UTC)