Talk:Madame du Barry

Absolute influence?
Q: in the page on Marie Antoinette, it says her influence over Louis XV was "absolute", but here it says "limited", which is it? (moved from page)
 * She didn't have a lot of political power over Louis XV but when she decided about what to do with certain individuals, she was "absolute" in giving her opinion... like what she did to Duke de Choiseul. Lincher 14:19, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Either she was executed by stoning or by guillotine. Which was it?68.72.109.168 17:12, 14 March 2007 (UTC) Guillotine.Babyboy160 (talk) 23:45, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

WP Biography Rating
Due to a backlog it is no longer possible to give comment on ratings. Please put any comments/questions on my talk page. GDon4t0 20:30, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Courtesan after 1774
It says she was courtesan after 1774. She did have affairs, but unless the men payed her, then she was not a prostitute, she simply had a love life. -85.226.45.121 (talk) 22:10, 27 November 2008 (UTC)


 * She was a kept woman. -208.87.248.162 (talk) 19:08, 30 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Courtesan means a woman of the royal Court. Your problem is your own misunderstanding of English.
 * Please do not publish my IP — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:44b8:4146:600:2119:fb6f:9fe9:d2f0 (talk) 19:43, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Posthumous portrait
How could one of her protraits by Élisabeth Vigée Le Brun could be posthumous if painted circa 1789? Mme du Barry was executed in 1793. Frania W. (talk) 13:37, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Vigee-Lebrun started the unfinished portrait of du Barry prior to the Revolution; Vigee-Lebrun was one of the first emigres to leave France and only finished the painting long after du Barry was deceased. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.23.72.127 (talk) 20:40, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Treatment of Mme du Barry in article
Oceanblueeyes: The hidden comments about which you are getting upset are mine, with my signature *FW* for Frania Wisniewska, which you could have guessed by going back to the date when comments were inserted. May I point out to you that hidden comments within text are not *accusations of lies* (please find one instance where I accused you of lying), they are addressed as a point of discussion to the editor who wrote the contested part. That's what Wikipedia is all about. The fact that you may have read hundreds of books on one subject does not mean that everyone will agree that you know more about that subject than anyone else. There may be books you have not read. For instance, have you read memoirs in French written by individuals who personally knew Mme du Barry? If you have not, you should, because this would make you realise that, depending on whether they liked her or not, the authors of these memoirs either praised her or thrashed her (the duc de Choiseul, for instance, who could not stand her because he had tried to have his own sister become official mistress to Louis XV, so you can imagine what he wrote about Mme du B!). Some authors and libellists did not treat her any better than was treated Marie Antoinette, with similar accusations of both women being whores, which, as the article stands, gives the impression that it is what Mme du Barry was, i.e. a modern call girl. Frania W. (talk) 13:38, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Baptism registration
Translation of birth registration signed by the curate of Vaucouleurs and Jeanne Bécu's godparents, Joseph Demange and Jeanne Birabin, should suffice to end the mini edit war RE her real first name as given at time of her birth.

Following is text of footnote n° 1 added this date to article:
 * "***Translation of Jeanne Bécu's baptism registration: *Jeanne* Bécu, natural daughter of Anne Bécu, surnamed Quantigny, was born on the nineteenth of August, seventeen-hundred-and-forty-three, and was baptised the same day, having for godfather Joseph Demange and for godmother Jeanne Birabin, who have signed with us. (signed by) L. Gahon, curate of Vaucouleurs. Joseph Demange, Jeanne Birabin., in A King's favourite, Madame du Barry, and her times from hitherto unpublished documents by Claude Saint-André with an introduction by Pierre de Nolhac and 17 illustrations, New York, Mc Bride, Nast & Company, 1915, p. 3 (a translation from the French publication by Tallandier, Paris, 1909.)***
 * Frania W. (talk) 18:27, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Courtesy on footnotes
Footnote inserted by one editor should not be added to by another editor as it removes the sense of the original footnote. If additional information needs to be given by another editor, then create a new footnote. Frania W. (talk) 22:59, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Alledged Irrelevance
I feel that the section marked as "of questionable pertinence" to the article contributes a lot to understanding the character and position of Dubarry in her time and place. Her history has great social interest. -208.87.248.162 (talk) 19:07, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Similarly, but more generally, the entire article should be condensed, omitting or summarising any contentious and trivial elements. It is enough to point to external sources who examine those things in detail, as it seems many of the purported facts here are of subtle import or require detailed evaluation of subtleties which are beyond the ken of a general reader. Encyclopaediae are for general readers, not specialist academic debate, nor for drooling over sensationalist gossip. Please do not publish my IP — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:44b8:4146:600:2119:fb6f:9fe9:d2f0 (talk) 19:53, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 22:46, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Image change
I think we should change the image on this page - I know it’s not frequently used in works about du Barry and the outfit is very similar to Marie Antoinette’s in another le Brun portrait, so I’m worried it would confuse people. Dancingtudorqueen (talk) 04:05, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Note
I have chosen to publish the IP of the unsigned editor above because it is important to know when and by whom a Wikipedia edit was made (especially an unsigned comment) and Wikipedia is more important than just one person. If the IP editor really wanted their IP address hidden, they could have created an account. Graham87 (talk) 05:48, 16 January 2024 (UTC)