Talk:Madonna of the Stairs

Old
When was the Madonna made? (this question was originally posted by User:220.239.224.228 on the article page) -Big Smooth 23:51, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Madonna of the Stairs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080229111528/http://www.casabuonarroti.it:80/english/e-mad.htm to http://www.casabuonarroti.it/english/e-mad.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 09:08, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Madonna of the Stairs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080229111528/http://www.casabuonarroti.it/english/e-mad.htm to http://www.casabuonarroti.it/english/e-mad.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:52, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Cleanup templates
No choice but to add the two templates regarding lack of citations and that it reads more like a review. Art critique is certainly valuable but it is not encyclopedic, especially when you can't reference it.

Huge fan of Michelangelo, and took an art history course for college 20 years ago, but a better art historian is clearly needed to describe and bring knowledge about this clearly beautiful and technical sculpture.Shortiefourten (talk) 23:16, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

"reminiscent of the classic rods"
"reminiscent of the classic rods": the phrase is nonsense. Does anyone have an idea how it should be corrected?METRANGOLO1 (talk) 10:03, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, added like that. Probably "reminiscent of classical reliefs", which is no more OR than the rest of it. I'll change. Johnbod (talk) 14:59, 9 January 2022 (UTC)