Talk:Madonna studies

Proposed merge with Madonna (entertainer)
Very short section, no scope of expansion anymore, every item has been included in the short prose, can easily be included in #Legacy. — Indian: BIO  · [ ChitChat  ] 12:51, 24 February 2013 (UTC)


 * No per this. Best regards, Apoxyomenus (talk) 16:44, 11 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Oh, I have the answer, but I will give a . Regards, Apoxyomenus (talk) 13:20, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Okay I'm back. The case not proceeds because no is necesary, that simple. It is only a article too small, in short words is a Stub that can we easily enlarge. There are several references that can be added, for example:


 * 1991 from Orlando Sentinel (of three pages and several comments on this term)




 * 1994 from The New York Times


 * 1997 from Rick Ross (presided by Vanity Fair). Note: Well, may be serves of somewhat.


 * Book: Madonna as Postmodern Myth: How One Star's Self-Construction Rewrites Sex by Georges Claude Guilbert (here talk -also- about the Musicology department entitled Madonna: The Music and the Phenomenon; and in other contexts, according to Quien magazine, the Seven Sisters (colleges) taught courses by her influence on culture)


 * Book: The Madonna Companion: Two Decades of Commentary by Allan Metz and C. Benson. "Despite this new tendency to sentimentalize popular culture and exaggerate its subversive content, Madonna Studies in fact represent the ultimate act of cultural imperialism in the sense that Madonna simply provides a lift into the saddle for ..."


 * Book: Media and Cultural Theory " Indeed, David Gauntlett uses the term 'Madonna Studies' ..." (110)


 * Book: Beauty And Misogyny: Harmful Cultural Practices In The West ✅


 * Book: From Hegel to Madonna: Towards a General Economy of "commodity Fetishism" ✅

These are only a few references. Actually apart from the comments of many authors for this term, were written several essays or thesis, may be Madonnarama: Essays on Sex and Popular Culture is a example (And is need to create Bibliography about Madonna because is a relevant article). With this and more, well you can create a section called "Context" and / or "Critics about this term / phenomenon".

Best regards, Apoxyomenus (talk) 03:32, 11 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Umm, just wow Chris, wow. Bow down bitches!!! You are amazing for resources. This article can surely be kept since it can be expanded a zillion times. AGain, bow down. Removing the merge tag. — Indian: BIO  · [ ChitChat  ] 05:21, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned references in Madonna Studies
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Madonna Studies's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Newitz": From Bibliography of works on Madonna:  From Cultural impact of Madonna:  

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:02, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Refs
--Apoxyomenus (talk) 18:57, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
 * "Madonnology"

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:37, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Madonna revistapelo 1985.jpg

Badly written
A lot of this article has been written (or copied and auto-translated) by someone who is clearly not an English-language speaker. Such as this from the opening paragraph of 'criticisms':

"The Madonna studies generated a great amount of criticisms among scholars and others commentators. Internationally, it also raised disapproval and an editor commented that "was a laugh hear of Madonna studies" for many overseas..."

This is complete gibberish. 86.87.191.180 (talk) 17:41, 19 August 2023 (UTC)


 * It is. However, you can help to improve grammar, connectors and more. --Apoxyomenus (talk) 17:54, 19 August 2023 (UTC)