Talk:Magnum P.I. (2018 TV series) season 2

Magnum P.I. (2018 TV series) season 2 has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: December 10, 2020. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Magnum P.I. (2018 TV series) season 2 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Magnum P.I. (2018 TV series, season 2)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 02:36, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, we meet again! I'll be reviewing this article and will have my assessment by Thursday 12:00pm ET. Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 02:36, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds great! Definitely looking forward to working with you again. Thanks, TheDoctorWho (talk) 03:21, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Basic stuff and comments[edit]

Archive all archivable sources. Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 13:58, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Because it certainly will become an article, I would link "third season" to Magnum P.I. (2018 TV series, season 3). Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 13:58, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Cast section passes MOS:TVCAST so that's good. Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 13:58, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Episode summaries are all under 200 words and pass MOS:TVPLOT. Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 13:58, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
To add clarity, add the episode title "He Came by Night" in between the sentence found in "production" that reads: "On the November 15, 2019, episode the band". Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 13:58, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
In "Marketing", link "tenth season" to Hawaii Five-0 (2010 TV series, season 10). Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 13:58, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Also in "Marketing", add commas after "the Hawaii Five-0 series finale" and "In Canada". Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 13:58, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"Viewing figures" and "Home media" both pass MOS:TVRELEASE.

Well, those are my first set of suggestions. Ping me when you have added comments. Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 13:58, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Some Dude From North Carolina: Everything you mentioned has been taken care of. TheDoctorWho (talk) 18:25, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In "Development", remove the comma after 2019 in the sentence, "On the November 15, 2019,". Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 18:48, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Remove the gap between "Marketing" and "Viewing figures". Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 18:48, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
In "Marketing", fix the "tenth season" link. Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 18:48, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
In reference 36, could you change the link from Variety (magazine) to simply Variety?

@TheDoctorWho: Well, this is my second and final set of suggestions. Great work on the article! Ping me when done. Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 18:48, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Some Dude From North Carolina: Done with those as well! TheDoctorWho (talk) 19:11, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·