Talk:Maitum anthropomorphic pottery

Untitled
Ok guys, to play the game according to your rules, I have rewritten the article and it is now in the Temp page. Kindly notify me first before you do any summary executions again. Look, I am not hiding in any way.

I still have rewritten this soon-to-be-deleted page because the copyright violation notice looks bad and, again, suggest an air of paranoia.

By the way, the sketch was made by me and I give the GFDL license to it Latorilla 16:35, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)

This article has a copyright permission from LDC, Inc. Foundation. For verifications please contact Elpidio Latorilla at elpidio@care2x.us

Better article name
Would this article be better titled under Maitum anthropomorphic pottery? Title case for names is generally not used (e.g., Filipino language instead of Filipino Language) and pottery is one of those weird collective nouns. Just a suggestion. :) --seav 21:53, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)


 * Agreed. "Pottery" is an uncountable noun. There are pots, and the artistry is pottery. - Boneyard90 (talk) 23:56, 9 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Strong support. - I don't actually think that's a controversial move. It's just an application of WP:MOS isn't it? If I weren't on mobile and thus feeling limited I'd have performed it already.-Alternativity (talk) 16:42, 8 October 2017 (UTC)