Talk:Mammalian eye

Is this article necessary?
Seems to me that Evolution of the eye and Eye are necessary, as well as the detail articles such as Retina. But I can't see any use for both Human eye and Mammalian eye; they overlap too much. Should perhaps Human eye be merged into this one? - Hordaland (talk) 14:31, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mammalian eye. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.lx040-001.gsbme.unsw.edu.au/~greggs/eye_web/anatomy.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060927122539/http://www.clinica-cotero.es/i/2-1-1.htm to http://www.clinica-cotero.es/i/2-1-1.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:38, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mammalian eye. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080920140056/http://www.e-sunbear.com/anatomy_02.html to http://www.e-sunbear.com/anatomy_02.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:31, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Proposed merge of Mammalian vision into Mammalian eye
Seemed to be carved out of Mammalian eye for an unexplained reason. The account that created it has been globally locked for extensive abuse.  scope_creep Talk  16:23, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Oppose For the 2nd. One is a process, another is another organ in the body. Completely different knowledge domains.   scope_creep Talk  23:00, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Why is this article surprisingly human-centric?
Guys. This is an article about eyes in mammals yet why does this article still mention human exclusive stuff?

If you want to put human only information go to human eye because this is an article on mammals, not humans.

This is ridiculous. We need to fix this. LoverOfAllAnimalsActivist (talk) 10:34, 12 May 2024 (UTC)