Talk:Manila sound

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
 * This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
 * There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
 * It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
 * In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 02:55, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Essay-like
Fellow Wikipedians,

I've added the essay-like tag as I feel that is the issue with the article: not lack of citations but not adhering to MoS/NPOV rules.

If someone with more expertise in the topic area could clear this up that would be fabulous.

Regards,

Dr Strauss  talk  15:07, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Manila Sound. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20100210064902/http://showbizandstyle.inquirer.net/you/vidvibe/view/20060629-7285/Kala:_Manila_sound_is_back_in_the_groove to http://showbizandstyle.inquirer.net/you/vidvibe/view/20060629-7285/Kala%3A_Manila_sound_is_back_in_the_groove

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:18, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Requested move 16 March 2020

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: Page moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jerm (talk) 22:07, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Manila Sound → Manila sound – Per MOS:GENRECAPS, music genres are not capitalised, unless the genre name contains a proper name such as the name of a place; in this case "Manila", so "sound" should be in lower case. Hiddenstranger (talk) 07:43, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Support the article content already uses this case anyway.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 17:59, 16 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

"Manila sound" or "Manila Sound"
Guys, I don't have a horse in this race, so I am just observing here now, and hoping you will read this humble suggestion:

"Manila Sound" is a proper name. It was invented by the the record companies during its time to describe a new style of Filipino pop music.

https://www.onemusic.ph/news/in-spite-of-martial-law-manila-sound-shone-1052

https://www.philstar.com/entertainment/2014/08/23/1360617/manila-sound-back

https://www.rappler.com/entertainment/music/hotdog-band-classic-songs-manila-sound

Please MOVE this page to a correctly spelled name (caps & lower). Peace and Love, Buszmail (talk) 06:57, 6 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Per Wikipedia rules, please see MOS:GENRECAPS and the closed discussion above. Thanks. ~ Hiddenstranger (talk) 07:32, 6 April 2021 (UTC)