Talk:Marcab Confederacy

Arbitrary section
I have to say, well done on the article information + images, but in terms of this topic; i've never heard as much shit in my life :-) ♥♥ ΜÏΠЄSΓRΘΠ€ ♥♥ slurp me! 08:17, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

You won't be laughing when the Marcab Confederacy returns to re-conquer the planet.

This has nothing to do with any scientific evidence. Mr. Hubbard made Science Fiction, not Science (see that fiction is the aim of the genre). To make Science Fiction claims factual es like believing the FlintsStones world was real, with feet running cars and stone Pick Up records played by birds, etc. A work of fantasy.

This article reminds me of question I've been wanting to aks for a while.
Namely, how do you delete an article on Wikipedia?Fizzackerly 14:16, 17 May 2007 (UTC)


 * If this article were merged with the Space Opera in Scientology article, that might be best. It is unlikely to ever be more than a stub. 69.12.131.206 23:15, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Um... but it isn't a stub. wikipediatrix 23:32, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Removed deletion template. No good reason to delete. This is an important page. 71.169.183.79 (talk) 03:07, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

NO WAI
You have to be kidding me. This is a prank, right? There is no way anyone can actually believe this, unless they are half a cracker short of a picnic basket. (a5y (talk) 02:15, 9 March 2008 (UTC))

Yes wai
This is honest to god what the scilons believe in... seriosuly - a5y, it is, but in order to be told this scilons first have to fork over around 300.000$ to pay for 'courses' if i'm not wrong. and by that time they should be nice and indoctrinated so they'll believe it. (Webkilla (talk) 11:48, 12 June 2008 (UTC))

Suggest Merge
The Marcab stuff was never a secret and is mentioned in the Technical Dictionary. This article should be deleted or merged with Space opera in Scientology scripture.S. M. Sullivan (talk) 07:42, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

This article reads like fact
It does not conform to wikipedia standards. An article about fiction should read like fiction. Stating any of this absolute trash as fact makes wikipedia about as credible as the "Star Wars Technical Journal" series.

This is a good example of why Wikipedia has been banned for use as a study source in just about every educational institution / research department in the world. --75.49.208.245 (talk) 10:24, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Delete
Looks like fiction, reads like "fact" (I use the term loosely here). The rantings of a psychotic man used to brainwash sheep should not be viewed as facts, rather the delusions of the founder of a dangerous cult that they are.

If the portions of this article that were not cited by a neutral source (I would hardly consider LRH's ranting as an acceptable source, if I start talking about the secret agendas of squirrels, does that make it verifiable and accurate?), there would be little to nothing left of it. This is in NO way an important article, and has no place on wiki unless it has a giant "THIS IS A WORK OF FICTION" tag stamped across the top. -S —Preceding unsigned comment added by 214.42.5.5 (talk) 04:21, 27 November 2010 (UTC)