Talk:Margariti

Albanian Name
Albanian name is Margëlleç. Margëlleç reference —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarandioti (talk • contribs) 09:49, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Alexikoua and Athenean ok that we put this in the article? I know that Sarandioti is now defunct, but this is properly referenced.sulmues (talk contribs) --Sulmues 18:50, 31 December 2009 (UTC)


 * A ultranationalist Albanian website is definitely not an acceptable source. Not OK.  --Athenean (talk) 20:11, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Now you have a book, not a website any longer.sulmues (talk contribs) --Sulmues 20:27, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * A single (pro-Albanian) book means nothing. Our readers will almost certainly not encounter "Margellec" in the literature:  A search of Google books returns only 1 hit for "Margellec" .  And for the nth time, Jakup Veseli & Co. are not notable.  --Athenean (talk) 21:00, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Incorrect! It means a lot to me and to a lot of others, probably not to you. And Jakup Veseli is a founding father of the Albanian nation, so it is extremely important. I ask the opinion of a third person that is not a greek or an Albanian before you rerevert me again. sulmues (talk --Sulmues 14:29, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Marcellec is the Albanian name and if your google books give too little, that's not important. And Jakup Veseli was notable as per AfD. In addition please stop using double standards with using greek in Delvine and Himare and "forgetting" the Albanian names for the Cham settlements. sulmues (talk --Sulmues 19:48, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Margariti. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150921212047/http://dlib.statistics.gr/Book/GRESYE_02_0101_00098%20.pdf to http://dlib.statistics.gr/Book/GRESYE_02_0101_00098%20.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303183824/http://dlib.statistics.gr/Book/GRESYE_02_0101_00086.pdf to http://dlib.statistics.gr/Book/GRESYE_02_0101_00086.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100516230449/http://www.margariti-gr.de/gr/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogsection&id=8&Itemid=73 to http://www.margariti-gr.de/gr/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogsection&id=8&Itemid=73

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:25, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

POV template
@Alexikoua If you reverted again with unxplained objection like The use of the template is innapropriate i will put the POV template, since consensus has not been reached. FierakuiVërtet (talk) 02:42, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
 * per wp:BRD you need to present your arguments for your addition here. You understand that simply saying don't revert again can't be an argument by itself.Alexikoua (talk) 02:53, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
 * My argumentations are all recorded, don't worry. The one explaining should be you:
 * At my edit, in which i added Cham expulsion/Cham issue, you replied by adding Cham coll. with the Axis, as implying a causation relationship between the two events, which is not the case since Greece already started to clean that Epirus. Therefore, this was not neutrality, as you called it. This is called purposedly misleading the reader.
 * Thereafter, to clarify, i added the Population exchange between Greece and Turkey. To which you responded by making up excuses to bury these links at the bottom of the list, such as the alphabetical order.
 * Then, when i specify that the chronological order was to be followed, you replied ok and buried again those links by adding nothing to secure a more neutral view, as you like to call, which is The Greek War of Indipendence and one of the many Epirus revolts. Nothing to secure neutrality. (and even without explaining).
 * Everybody can see your foul play, which is even more obvious by the way you protested my decision to put it in the History section (which is the first thing people will see when reading anyway). Moreover, you didn't specify why you considered this use of the template inappropriate, as you called it.
 * Everybody can see it! The one being warned is you. FierakuiVërtet (talk) 04:09, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
 * wp:NPA needs to be avoided. I added the collaboration article next to expulsion to secure a neutral viewing for the readers. There should be neutrality in the links offered not simply providing links that victimizes one side. On the one side you add Albanian related articles while downplay Greek related ones (Greek revolution or even ). Please avoid inappropriate wording such as foul play. It's not cool. Alexikoua (talk) 04:16, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
 * 1)Foul play can be used, if i bump into it that. Maybe you should re-read what constitutes a 'personal attack'.
 * I repeat: anyone can see what you have done. You've just admitted:
 * 'Victimizes one side' This means you tried to justify/adjust the Muslim Cham expulsion, which is purposedly misleading. Because, as you know:
 * Greece had already started to clean Epirus (and all of Greece).
 * There were already tensions between Albanian muslim (muslims in general) and Greeks after they got conquered during the Balkan Wars (which is what this article says)
 * 2) I added Exchange of the population and Partition of Albania, which added neutrality. Instead, you just started to put all sort of history articles just to bury the others. Why don't you add even the Bizantine Empire?
 * Meanwhile, i myself put Cham issue on the bottom of Cham coll. with the A.
 * If we want to speak neutrally: the minorities must be respected and not nationalized. FierakuiVërtet (talk) 05:30, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
 * According to your rationale the article should be planted with the same links according to your personal POV (that point to the victimization of a specific ethnic community, with securing a neutral approach on the topic). Those links you add here and there are also present in the Chams template, so do not add them in multiple sections of this article, even in 'see also'. You crossed the line here.Alexikoua (talk) 19:43, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
 * My last edit summary was added by mistake and I apologize to the editor in question. However, I have explained the revert as my comment above.Alexikoua (talk) 20:01, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I am simply exposing the facts:
 * Partion of Albania
 * Greece-Turkey exchange
 * Cham coll. w. the Axis
 * ''Cham expulsion
 * These garantee a neutral point of view (that is what you are asking), which is what i've been trying to do (Indeed, i am not removing Cham coll. w the Axis). Menawhile...


 * The fact that you called it victimization and started to put Ottoman Greece and Epirus (which is a multiracial region since 1200) does not contribute to the neutrality. This is call faul play.


 * I don't understand what you are doing with the Albanian name, Margëlliç, since it was not my edit.


 * One last thing, you are falsely accusing in the edit summaries. Stop! Everybody can see our IP, i will report you if you continue maliciously accusing me. FierakuiVërtet (talk) 20:19, 24 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Aside from User:FierakuiVërtet's edits being disruptive and the account is found to be a WP:SOCK and blocked indefinitely, which for me is a reason to not ever bother discussing with them on the talk page, however I feel inclined to notify here that since their problematic edits stayed, I had to partially revert them myself, and especially the addition of Partition of Albania from "See also" section which had POV-pushing implications since Margariti was never part of the Albanian state, only of the Ottoman Empire and later Greece. Adding the partitioning of a third country there, is to suggest that the village had anything to do with the actual event of the partition. It did not. The only relation of the village to that partition is an hypothetical scenario of the Treaties ending up different, under different circumstances, which still is unecyclopedic, and judging from the actions of the sock, also against the good faith use of "See Also".
 * Edit 1: I just reverted more of the Sock's changes to the article, as well as an IP's ones. I am not sure if the IP is related to the Sock in any way, but the Sock appears to have suspiciously benefited from the IP's edits. Edit 2: the IP first removes a Wikilink from the main body and that prompts Alexikoua in adding that Wikilink to the "See Also" which in turn prompts the Sock to add even more to "See Also". However using the "See Also" this way is not how it is supposed to be. The "See Also" can not be used as a workaround for the lack of wikilinks on the main body from the moment it already mentions the events, nor it can be used as a means for a Sock to emphasize on certain events for POV-pushing purposes, nor may have Wikilinks added for neutrality/balancing purposes). The second comment edit is due to me confusing 2 revisions with each other and correctional changes can be found here: . My apologies for the confusion. Nevertheless, considering the above developments and outcomes, I share User:Alexikoua's concerns for POV-pushing through the repeated use wikilinks across both the Main body of Article, the "See Also" section and the Cham Albanians template below and I can not WP:CONSENT to this misuse of the "See Also" section. --- ❖ SilentResident ❖ (talk &#9993; &#124; contribs &#9998;) 12:40, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Those see also links clearly fall into wp:POINT, part of a desperate attempt to show that this article belongs to Albanian expansionist plans. Although those links are already part of the Cham template he insists to add them in various sections so to overemphasize his personal wp:POV. This falls into disruptive editing not to mention persistent wp:NPA violations.Alexikoua (talk) 16:48, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Cite Error on article
@Maleschreiber, the following revision: dated 20:14, 2 September 2022is causing a Cite Error on the article's bottom. I would fix it myself but I am not sure how you meant your edit to be. Can you look at your edits please? - ❖ SilentResident ❖ (talk &#9993; &#124; contribs &#9998;) 15:01, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Good observation, thanks.--Maleschreiber (talk) 15:19, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

3rd-grade source needs verification and evaluation
Xhufi's dubious (and offline) work needs full citation. It won't be a surprise since Xhufi made several historical errors of that kind (as in the case of Moscopole). For future reference Venetian sources never used the Margelic.Alexikoua (talk) 20:17, 17 January 2024 (UTC)