Talk:Maria Chappelle-Nadal

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Maria Chappelle-Nadal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110220103631/http://www.sos.mo.gov/enrweb/allresults.asp?eid=300 to http://www.sos.mo.gov/enrweb/allresults.asp?eid=300
 * Added tag to http://m.newstribune.com/news/2014/dec/29/ferguson-inspired-law-enforcement-bills-proposed/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:02, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Why was the portion of her "hoping Trump gets assassinated" removed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:82:203:3348:25A5:F995:9AAC:402F (talk) 02:02, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Emanuel Cleaver calls for resignation
On a August 19, 2017 Fox News broadcast, Congressman Emanuel Cleaver called for Maria Chappelle-Nadal resignation over the comments calling for the assassination of President Donald Trump. Let us eat lettuce (talk) 15:54, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Maria Chappelle-Nadal responds to calls for resignation
Maria Chappelle-Nadal put up a Facebook post saying, ‘I really hate Trump. He’s causing trauma and nightmares.’ “I hope Trump is assassinated!” When asked to resign, she replied, "Hell no." in an interview, and refused to apologize—twice. Let us eat lettuce (talk) 16:12, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

The use of the word "Aftermath"
I reverted an edit where an editor used the word "aftermath" in the section describing Chappelle-Nadal's call for Trump assassination. "Aftermath" is not used by any of the reliable sources. It implies that there was a legitimate reason for her comments. There is no legitimate reason for her comments and the reliable sources do not provide one. It is POV-pushing. No reliable source, no use. Before that word is re-added by an editor that editor will need to discuss this on this talk page before you attempting to insert it or any controversial and questionable wording. The article is covered by Wikipedia discretionary sanctions because it falls within the topic of American politics. There be a concensus for edits.--SlackerDelphi (talk) 16:56, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Using the word "aftermath" does not imply that there were legitimate reasons for her comments. Rather, it simply implies that because the event occurred, the comment was written. CoolieCoolster (talk) 18:01, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
 * CoolieCoolster is correct. As ghastly as that post was, the person who originally posted it later made several tweets apologizing for their remarks. Many of the people who have tried to circulate the image on social media have tried to share it as well, but with alternative media news sources known for political bias. --Bushido Hacks (talk) 19:47, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Maria Chappelle-Nadal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140814111205/http://www.kmov.com/news/local/Misinformation-about-situation-in-Ferguson-spreading-on-social-media-271159401.html to http://www.kmov.com/news/local/Misinformation-about-situation-in-Ferguson-spreading-on-social-media-271159401.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:21, 17 January 2018 (UTC)