Talk:Mario Baeza

Copyright concerns
This article may have been substantially copied from Baeza's official biography. However, please see the comment about "The Latino Educational Crisis: Towards a New Approach to Preparing Latino Children for Success in School and in Life ("About the Author")" above. We can't be sure of this without an older version of an official bio to compare. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:33, 28 March 2011 (UTC)


 * I have now modified and shortened many of the sections to reduce the promotionalism, and a side effect of that may have been to decrease the copyvio. DGG ( talk ) 17:34, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mario Baeza. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080517020947/http://www.nyc.gov/lmec to http://www.nyc.gov/lmec

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:40, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

COI editing by subject of article - revert to earlier version?
It appears the subject of this article has just added a huge amount of uncited and poorly-formatted content about themselves. I started to try to clean it up, but it reads so much like a CV that I don't think the effort to sort out this mess is justifiable. Here are just examples of the problem: 1) There are no proper references, just lots of incline External links to organisational homepages, and 2) I've already had to delete 49 uses of the honorific 'Mr.' added by the subject himself (or the user editing under that name, at least). The user knows so little of our editing requirements and Manual of Style, that I feel these edits are not helpful.

I propose that we revert the article to its 13 May 2020 version (see here), and then allow it to be built up again gradually, with proper inline citation. Anything that is not supported with a citation should be removed.

The subject of the article can make individual recommendations for edits (with citations) using the template on the Talk page, rather than adding it themselves.

Any support, dissent, or alternative suggestions? Pinging who previously cleaned up this article back in 2017, and  who made all these recent edits. Nick Moyes (talk) 19:11, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Support reversion to 13 May 2020. The lack of citations is a really big issue right now (the entire article only has one reference). — Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 )  19:32, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Support. Per Tenryuu and Nick Moyes. - SUB  WAY  21:41, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Support, and then redirect the articleon his bok,, and then consider protecting the redirect. DGG ( talk ) 17:01, 28 May 2020 (UTC)