Talk:Marissa Alexander case

POV: Use of words like notorious are not neutral and carry negative connotations.
POV: Use of words like notorious are not neutral and carry negative connotations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.204.228.36 (talk) 00:26, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

An Update is in Order
http://thesource.com/2014/10/17/justice-is-served-court-finally-overturns-marissa-alexanders-20-year-sentence/ deeceevoice (talk)

This article is dishonest, it is not mentioning the fact that Marissa Alexandra has a history of violent abuse, and had an injunction against her, and she went round to her Husbands house.

This is one of the worst articles I have seen on wikipedia ever. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.187.168.218 (talk) 18:04, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

http://mediatrackers.org/2013/07/16/no-marissa-alexanders-conviction-was-not-a-reverse-trayvon-martin-case-in-florida/

can this be used as a source? Your wiki article leaves out lots of details,. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.187.168.218 (talk) 18:18, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Sorry I am new to editing wikipedia.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2013/07/real-marissa-alexander-story-ian-tuttle/

Can this be used as a source as well? The wikipedia article has too many facts missing. The article is very bad. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.187.168.218 (talk) 18:36, 7 January 2019 (UTC)