Talk:Mary Frances Berry

Untitled
The entire paragraph on Berry's tenure at Pacifica is tendentious at the minimum, and many aspects are potentially false (cf ).

Furthermore I think it's pretty clear that the paragraph on the "Controversies as Chairperson of the US Commission on Civil Rights" contains a bit too much uncited editorializing Tychoish (talk) 18:29, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

NPOV
Ms Berry is a self-described lesbian; should that not be included in her biography? Homophobia, anyone? 63.146.74.221 (talk) 02:05, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

How is it homophobic to not specifically call out someone's sexual preference? Is there even one biography page on Wikipedia that includes the words "self-described heterosexual?" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ericcox (talk • contribs) 15:49, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

This article suffers from severe neutrality issues. I say severe because the format of the article alone, with sections for "Controversies as Chairperson of the US Commission on Civil Rights" and "Controversies as chair of Pacifica Radio Foundation National Board", promotes a POV, namely that the subject is controversial. Another problem with the article is its lack of chronology or narrative flow. It jumps back and forth in time and topic. There are sources, and this is an important topic. However due to the significant problems with the existing content I am going to cut it down substantially. Editors may (and should) add additional material while providing inline citations to any quotations or contentious assertions. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 02:38, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

wild guess here
This article was written by someone who hates her correct? I mean someone who reeeealy hates her! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.49.56.235 (talk) 06:42, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

2010 cleanup
I have done some fairly extensive cleanup of this article. I have removed two unverifiable contentious quotations, one from American Renaissance and the other from Washington Monthly. I would be happy to see these restored if somebody can verify the original quotations (neither publication offered a citation).

I believe the Neutral POV tag can be removed from this article.

There are still a couple of citations needed, but they are from a book she co-authored, which I do not own. They should be easy to verify, however. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.183.203.26 (talk) 22:09, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 23:22, 29 April 2016 (UTC)