Talk:Mato Vodopić

Intro paragraph
He partly lived under French occupation (1816-1868) and afterwads Austro-Hungarian. Why is one more relevant than the other in this case?

As in case of Šantić, you can not just choose to your liking, as you would on a buffet and stop any further dicussion with threats of edit war, while deleting other editor's links and giving pseudo answers, that is politically correct sentences which do not touch any real questions.

I think that it would also be accceptable to call him Ragusian, which is the case with many other articles on people from Dubrovnik.

Per WP:ETHNICITY - Ethnicity, religion, or sexuality should generally not be in the lead unless it is relevant to the subject's notability.

In the case of Vodopić - it is relevant, as it is to all the member of Serb-Catholic movenment.

Mm.srb (talk) 18:58, 16 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Vodopić wasn't a member of the Serb-Catholic movement. Governor Sheng (talk) 17:15, 11 February 2024 (UTC)