Talk:Maya calendar/Archives/2011/November

The Comalcalco brick is a hoax
The Comalcalco brick is NOT a reference to 13.0.0.0.0. First of all, here is a drawing of the brick: http://www.thecenterfor2012studies.com/comalcalco-brick.jpg. The Calendar round is clearly 4 Ahau 3 Xul. Supposedly this is the same Calendar Round as the one that will occur on 13.0.0.0.0. Unfortunately the Calendar Round on 13.0.0.0.0 will be 4 Ahau 3 K'ank'in. In addition, David Stuart is saying that the next glyph is a verb that uses the present tense so this has nothing to do with any future Calendar Round. When I search for information about Comalcalco I find a whole bunch of bizarre pseudo-scientific sites that claim that it was built by the Romans, the Hindus, etc., etc. Assuming that it is a classic period site, the brick in question refers to Sunday April 12, 873, Thursday April 25, 821 or Monday May 8, 769 (Julian dates). The anthropologist at INAH was reporting on a paper that was not yet published and was wrong. The media reports about this are just more dis-information related to the hysteria surrounding the new-age 2012 doomsday Hoax. Senor Cuete (talk) 15:39, 28 November 2011 (UTC)Senor Cuete

This was already debunked in Sven Gronemeyer and Barbara MacLeod’s 2012 paper on Tortuguero Monument 6, which last year referred to this Comalcalco brick, along with Erik Boot’s suggestion of a 2012 connection, and Marc Zender’s critique of this idea: http://www.wayeb.org/notes/wayeb_notes0034.pdf (see the bottom of page 8 and top of page 9 for the discussion of the Comalcalco brick in which Zender confirms that it is 3 Xul and suggests that it represents a date of 9.16.18.5.0 4 Ahau  3 Xul - Monday May 8th 769 (Julian)). Zender also discusses this here: http://famsi.org/pipermail/aztlan/2010-July/007528.html Senor Cuete (talk) 18:26, 28 November 2011 (UTC)Senor Cuete