Talk:Mega Man X6/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Nominator: 20:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Pokelego999 (talk · contribs) 00:58, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

Will take this on in the coming days. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 00:58, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

@

Six GA Criteria
1. Article is well-written.

2. No OR, all info is cited in the article.

3. Coverage is broad in depth and focus. Shows multiple aspects of the game.

4. Article appears neutral, and does not appear to hold a significantly negative nor positive stance on the subject.

5. Article appears stable. Does not appear to have had any major vandalism occur.

6. Article uses two fair use images with proper rationale.

Lead
-Looks good

Gameplay
-Looks good

Plot
-While not necessary for this GAN, I'd suggest trying to find sources to verify plot info, especially beyond quotes. Not a requirement, of course, and it is satisfactory as it is now.
 * Added some pages from the official manual.

Development
-Given the large amount of information discussing Gate's design in association with the Mavericks, I feel an additional image may be worthwhile here to help aid the reader in visually understanding this, though I am uncertain what image would best apply here. Otherwise, section looks good.
 * Added a picture of all the bosses with commentary from the artist.

Reception
-"Gaming Age found the game challenging to the point players would need to complete it in order to finish." ...That's how a game works? I assume this can be elaborated on in a more significant extent but right now it's worded very bluntly and isn't overall helpful to the article's Reception.

-"and felt the difficulty was higher than previous installments, despite boss designs lacking the appeal to make the player care." I'd reword here since "despite" implies these two things contradict each other despite both inherently being negatives for the game.
 * Revised.
 * Revised

Overall
-I apologize that this took so long to get done, so I hope I haven't caused any inconvenience with my tardiness. The article looks pretty solid overall. Just patch up a few tidbits and this should be good to go. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 21:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

No problem. Revised everything you mentioned.Tintor2 (talk) 22:16, 2 June 2024 (UTC)


 * @Tintor2 looks good. Happy to pass! Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 12:42, 3 June 2024 (UTC)