Talk:Melvin Endsley
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Super tagger[edit]
It is more than irritating to have refs removed when I am adding them. Obituaries in 2 major UK national papers is more than enough for notability. It's quicker to add refs than it is to drive by tagging, especially as they were already linked. By all means remove the ext links. Occuli (talk) 20:05, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
- Time to assume good faith buddy. Ever hear of edit conflicts? My apologies that the conflict upsets you, but it honestly is likely without the ability to "see" other editors as they edit. I was working on this article and you provided minimal work beyond the copyedits and content addition that I provided. I merged your edits, so don't get all worked up. If you were to review the diffs of my earlier edits while reviewing the initial article, you would recognize that there was no drive by tagging. With all due respect, it's seriously time for you to get a grip. And by the way, the time to remove maintenance tags is after you address the specific issues presented. Not before. Cind.amuse (Cindy) 21:16, 18 August 2011 (UTC)