Talk:Menat

Untitled
"For members, it served as a protective amulet..." Members of what? Spikebrennan 20:43, 1 August 2007 (UTC)


 * You're right -- that doesn't make sense. Turns out it was added in an edit going back to 15 June 2006, and it didn't make any sense then either (it's not like something was deleted later that gave that line some sense.) Am pretty sure the intended meaning in this case is "For believers" (likely of a certain cult). Changing... Captmondo 20:58, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

"This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale."
Whoever named this article "stub" doesn't know anything about "menat". Everything is very well explained: the origin and the necklace itself. The only criticism you may utter should be that there isn't a photo of a corresponding necklace. Perhaps someone can find it in a museum. --92.77.14.236 (talk) 09:05, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
 * rerated now. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 09:17, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

The rows
I would like to know about the rows, and if the dangly things at the bottom counted as a row. 173.197.211.18 (talk) 22:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)