Talk:Messianic Judaism/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

I believe this article should receive Good Article status. It has taken over three years to get it to where it is now, and most disputes seem to be resolved in its presentation. inigmatus (talk) 14:48, 5 August 2008 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Fixed a nested quotes issue. The Law and Grace section seems to use weasel words.  Suggest that be fixed, too.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Some sections need better citations--e.g., scriptural commentary, eschatology
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Several things seem redundant or handled in two places, e.g, People of God and Messianic Jewish Conversion
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * It is remarkable, and a credit to the editors, that such a controversial topic is presented so amicably.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * Still seems to be fairly actively edited.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * There is room for another image or two in an article of this size.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Despite the issues, I call this a pass. It's GA, but needs work for FA. Jclemens (talk) 18:16, 5 August 2008 (UTC)