Talk:Mexican Federal Highway 1

Mexicana los corredores carreteros federates is not the name of the institution created by this legislation. It is |los corredores carreteros federates or the "federal government highways corridors"
If someone from Mexico was doing the same thing to that of the US they would effectively be saying US US Highway System. Using Federal is already an indication of what level of government it pertains to. WP has already established a policy on this concerning the national football teams of countries. The members of those teams are not and do not have to be the nationality of that country but merely represent that country and the name by which that national football team should be called is based on the grammar of the original host countries name they have given it. The Mexicans have not given to the highways improvement program the name Mexicana los corredores carreteros federales. That is what you are attempting to I'm[ose on another country. Mexico is not English and it is not the US. We are not out to remake the world. When you say in Mexico federales you mean the national level of government and it is not expressed as "Mexican Federal ......", it is los corredores carreteros federales.2605:E000:9143:7000:ADF3:5457:D866:C0E6 (talk) 20:40, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
 * We have seen "US Interstate X" or "American Interstate X" in use in articles; ditto "British motorway system". Your example of "US US Highway System" would not be used since it isn't necessary to repeat the first word in the name to provide context because the name itself gives it.
 * We have an article titled Michigan State Trunkline Highway System, even though the official name chosen by the state government is just "State Trunkline Highway System", yet that name provides no geographic context. When context is given, that extra adjective can be dropped.  Imzadi 1979  →   23:00, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, but is it not being called Michiganian? Michigan and Michiganian are two distinct words. I know of no one that says they are a Michiganian or use Michiganian roads so why would the use of "Mexican" be so wonderful a description when in fact the road is of the country of Mexico, not the country of Mexican? Someone from Mexico already knows that Fed 1 is of their country so to attach q qualifier to it is unnecessary. Now if they wwre going to travel on a US road that would be different because it would be less common in many instances and then it would not referred to as a United Statesian road. Many times in the world it seems to be a bad habit of people in the US to refer to things from other countires or socieites as in the American model instead of from the national aspect of association. A road does not have nationality, it is of a nation, or state, or province or county, etc. People from the US tend to forget that is the WP is to be international then referring to something that is viewed locally one way and nationally another just encourages less than flatering events to follow. Not every country or people have developed the same way and how people from within another country or society may express themselves is very fundamentally anchored on their past not how the US classifies them according to our models. I think that the US could do better on this. It is something that many people have not had the need from outside thremselves to contemplate. Its occurance will in all likelihood not decrease as life continues this way. The thing that becomes so disharenting is that we may have already put what time we thought was necessary into something for WP to follow only after yhe fact to learn that we missed the boat.2605:E000:9143:7000:3832:5234:5BA4:7DB6 (talk) 15:49, 15 January 2018 (UTC)