Talk:Michael J. Fox/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: I will be reviewing this article. I am on vacation until Sept 5 so this review could take an upwards of 14 days.  Joe Gazz84 user•talk•contribs•Editor Review 00:33, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Quick Fail Criteria
The article passes quick fail criteria. A more detailed review will follow. -- Joe Gazz84 user•talk•contribs•Editor Review 00:40, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Has reliable sources Symbol support vote.svg
 * 2) Is written neutrally Symbol support vote.svg
 * 3) No valid cleanup tags Symbol support vote.svg
 * 4) Is relatively stable with no edit wars Symbol support vote.svg
 * 5) Not specifically concerned with a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint Symbol support vote.svg

Main Review Criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

Template was placed. More Info to come. -- Joe Gazz84 user•talk•contribs•Editor Review 02:53, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: -- Joe Gazz84 user•talk•contribs•Editor Review 03:24, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: -- Joe Gazz84 user•talk•contribs•Editor Review 03:24, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: -- Joe Gazz84 user•talk•contribs•Editor Review 03:24, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Hold Reasons

 * 1) Article has many tables and not much text therefore gets the major aspects but not the full focused aspects; for this reason I am uncomfortable with the MOS decision of this article. I have marked that as outside of my comfort zone and my request a secomd opinion when I return from my vacation. Update: I have decided to not request second opinion because of the major fix. This will just take slightly longer. You can ask me to file a second opinion request. -- Joe Gazz84 user•talk•contribs•Editor Review 22:07, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) I am undecided on the Original Research Policy. I will investigate more on that later on. Please do not worry about that now. ✅ Done added by Joe Gazz

Final comments on hold review: Mainly focusing. Article has 7 days.  Joe Gazz84 user•talk•contribs•Editor Review 03:29, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I believe the article meets GA status and would be delighted to see it achieve that. My thanks to yourself Joe for your helpful review.  I do not think it requires a second opinion Monkeymanman (talk) 19:58, 9 September 2010 (UTC)