Talk:Michael Moore

Negative Talk
Reading some of the more negative comments used against Michael Moore, someone might come to the conclusion that many of the people attacking this article would never have had anything positive to say. While critical remarks must be allowed, should they not be fair and reasonable? Since this is an article about Michael Moore, his documentaries and viewpoints - why allow it to become a platform for some of the more dodgy or ill-founded comments that are out there? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.166.254 (talk) 12:43, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Flak as a control tactic
Is balance the main issue here? For is not Michael Moore's real 'crime' that of beating the right-wing at their own game? So when he starts to get some hits on target, out comes the flak to shoot down him and his message. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.29.103.95 (talk) 20:37, 6 November 2023 (UTC)