Talk:Michael S. Bernick

Untitled
I am curious as to why this page is considered an advertisement. According to the Wikipedia guidelines, there should be 1) no opinions presented (I don't think that there are on this page), 2) No contestable facts (seems like everything on the page is matter-of-fact), 3) No contestable assertions (again, I don't see bold statements of any kind), and 4) Nonjudgemental language (I don't see where there are any opinions, programs, people, etc. that are either praised or disparaged). Any explanation as to the reason for the advertising tag would be appreciated Rwyrwa (talk) 17:55, 31 March 2011 (UTC)


 * You've worked a lot on this page and it's not blatant advertising as far as I can see. I removed the tag and wish you happy editing. PS - could you move the image to the infobox? I would do it myself but I'm terrible at both images and infoboxes. Zakhalesh (talk) 18:24, 31 March 2011 (UTC)