Talk:Michael Savage

LGBT?
In the categories down the bottom, he's filed under "LGBT Jews". I know there's rumors, but is there any real evidence he's gay or bi? Cheers 101.98.188.118 (talk) 07:26, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Is he a conspiracy theorist?
This keeps getting removed. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 19:54, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
 * I've re-added it, with two WP:RS which specifically use the words "conspiracy theories" in their description of him. There are more RS to verify the description, but we don't want to WP:OVERCITE in the lead section. This could be expanded in the main body of the article: he's promoted Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories, white genocide conspiracy theory, linking Christine Blasey Ford to the CIA and the Steele dossier, etc. It's a reasonable description by WP standards. Freezer Bernie (talk) 06:46, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Can someone fix the archiving?
Title says it all. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 19:54, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Radio
The Radio section paragraph begins:

"In mid 2006, Savage had 8–10 million listeners per week, which made his show the third most widely heard broadcast in the United States at that time."

The following paragraph gives the same number of listeners as in 2006:

"By 2009, The Savage Nation had an audience of 8 to 10 million listeners on 400 stations across the United States, making it the second most listened-to radio talk show in the country at the time."

One of these would seem to be in error. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrpeterkins (talk • contribs)

Question about the article's neutrality
A quick overview of the article raises concerns about the neutrality of it, as well as the decision to declare it a "good article". The article is unnecessarily long, reads like an endorsement, and downplays the criticism of the subject and the controversies he's involved in, attributing all criticism, even when it comes from reliable sources, and generally feels like it borders on whitewashing. In addition, "consipracy theorist" seems to have been removed again, despite the claim being properly cited. 46.97.170.112 (talk) 10:40, 31 August 2021 (UTC)