Talk:Michael Sonnenreich

Help Needed
Guys, can you help me add more information about Michael Sonnenreich? Thanks, if you have any questions about this, chat to me on my talk page Lemonpasta. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lemonpasta (talk • contribs) 06:08, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Making New Section for Michael S and Washington National Opera
CONTENT REMOVED
 * In my opinion NONE OF THIS is relevant to Sonnenreich, and if added to the article, should be deleted. Stay on topic. David notMD (talk) 21:31, 14 May 2018 (UTC)


 * I just need this here for a bit to help set up context on this and another article David notMD. Lemonpasta (talk) 01:01, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
 * please use a sandbox for snippets that you want to use elsewhere.
 * On a different note, I've added a banner shell and commented out the Jewish-American parameters that are not currently supported. I also removed a category invocation that you had added - these categories are populated by the banners, not by direct invocation.  — jmcgnh (talk) (contribs) 05:22, 15 May 2018 (UTC)


 * None of this is in Wikipedia-appropriate style. WAY TOO subjective in tone. And abysmally unreferenced. Deletion-worthy if you try to add it to the Domingo article. David notMD (talk) 11:30, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm not adding this article to Michael Sonnenreich Lemonpasta (talk) 9:29, 15 May 2018 (EST)

Explain your reasoning Lemonpasta (talk) 20:43, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
 * And I asked Michael Sonnenreich if the information was accurate and he verified it. Lemonpasta (talk) 20:44, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Please read this information and this. Nobody can act as a source of information about themselves. If the Pope came to Wikipedia and started editing the article about himself, he would not be allowed to add information that is not in reliable sources that are entirely independent of himself. As you are in contact with Sonnenreich, you should ideally not be editing the article directly, only suggest changes here on this talk page. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 20:47, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Check what I wrote under my user page. I don't have a conflict of interest. Once this article is near perfect enough, i'll leave and work on another article. Lemonpasta (talk) 21:11, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Above, you said And I asked Michael Sonnenreich if the information was accurate and he verified it. That means you have a conflict of interest, as you have personal contact with the subject, to the point where you ask his opinion of what should go into the article. Have you had time to read the information about verifiability, reliable sources, and conflict of interest that have been posted here and on your user talk page? --bonadea contributions talk 15:06, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

POV
What is the issue?Slatersteven (talk) 15:01, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The article was created by a COI editor (see discussion in the previous section). Several other people have also edited the article which means that the POV issues may have been solved, but it really needs an uninvolved editor to look at it. --bonadea contributions talk 15:08, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * It is hard to discus POV issues if we do not know what the issues actually are. What (specifically) is being objected to?Slatersteven (talk) 15:10, 17 May 2018 (UTC)