Talk:Microsoft.com

Untitled
Er... is this page necessary? I mean, all this detail about a particular website at a particular point in time... I'm sure the filenames and whatnot will change rather rapidly. It seems to me that what useful material is in here really belongs in Microsoft. But that's just my two cents. -Chinju

Kingturtle, what are you smoking? Graft


 * And can I have some too please? Tannin

Huh? I don't see anything different with this article than the Goatse.cx article. Kingturtle 23:53 20 May 2003 (UTC)


 * I wish people would stop creating articles in order to make points. I thought it was bad enough that Ed Poor did that... no need to imitate him. Graft 00:43 21 May 2003 (UTC)

I love this part;
 * Images on the page show business people and families with with expressions of satisfaction and joy. The images names are artHome5.gif, artTech5.gif, and artBiz5.gif.

WOW! I learned something! This is beyond silly - at least it gave me a good laugh. :) --mav

Kingturtle, in his zeal to make a point, is ignoring that the goatse site is notorious for the front page image, which I'm assuming has been unchanged since it was first added. And yes, I've had the misfortune of seeing the image; and yes, I wish I hadn't. Nonetheless, it is a notorious site, regardless of whether we approve. Koyaanis Qatsi


 * I apologize for making this article. I must say, it is funny to read.


 * Koyaanis, my concern is not that the goatsex site exists. I have no desire to censor that site. Nor have I ever asked to delete the wiki-article about it. My concerns lie in two arenas...
 * making the goatsex article less graphic, so more people will read it without being put off
 * removing excess information in the goatsex article, like file names, server locations, domain owners. Kingturtle 02:34 21 May 2003 (UTC)


 * Thanks for clarifying. I think people ought to be put off by reading about the site, else they might be traumatized further by visiting it.  As far as "excess" information goes, don't you think that's a subjective judgment you're making?  Koyaanis Qatsi

- Though I am not sure about some smoking, I agree definitely this article is unnecessary. An encyclopedia as we know is a collection of our knowledge, which is not the same as mere information. Think what can we learn from this article? Why don't you just visit microsoft.com instead of reading this article. That should be better experience. -- Taku 02:46 21 May 2003 (UTC)