Talk:Microsoft Corp. v. Shah

Untitled
Is footnote 9 really necessary? It seems duplicative of footnote 4 and, given the obscene photo that accompanies the article, is unlikely to be a reputable source. Is it too much to ask for at least an NSFW warning for a link that contains pornographic images?207.157.94.254 (talk) 16:09, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment
This article is the subject of an educational assignment at University of California, Berkeley supported by WikiProject Intellectual Property law and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program&#32;during the 2012 Q3 term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:57, 2 January 2023 (UTC)