Talk:Mike Scully/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 22:23, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * This article is well written and is sufficiently compliant with the MoS.
 * I made a few minor copy-edits.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * All on line references are live
 * The article is adequately referenced.
 * All references appear to be WP:RS
 * All the on-line sources support the cited statements. I assume good faith for off-line sources.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * The article is braod and focussed. It will need contious updates as Scully's career progresses.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * One image used, correctly licensend and captioned.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Well, this is good to go. I am happy to list this as a good article. Congratulations. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 22:44, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Well, this is good to go. I am happy to list this as a good article. Congratulations. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 22:44, 8 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks very much! Gran2 22:50, 8 April 2010 (UTC)