Talk:Milkweed Editions

awards
The two awards sections that take up a big part of the page need third party sources to establish due weight/notability (call it what you will). As of now it's just promotional. --&mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  |  01:09, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

I tend to agree with the above statement. Although I do not find the lists obviously promotional, I cannot find sources to support the importance of these awards sufficiently to warrant the emphasis given them in the article. I don't want to remove them myself, but I would support a consensus if there is one to remove them. Edward Dixon (talk) 15:56, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I agree too and support removing them. Theroadislong (talk) 15:59, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your quick reply. If I don't hear an opposing view within a few days, I will delete them. Is that a reasonable plan? Edward Dixon (talk) 16:22, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Done as promised. Edward Dixon (talk) 04:03, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Milkweed Editions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20130124105629/http://www.goodthings.com/02_02_milkweed.asp to http://www.goodthings.com/02_02_milkweed.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:18, 31 January 2018 (UTC)