Talk:Miss Pooja

Reason not to speedy
I have been working with the original creator on this article so COI prevents me from declining the speedy myself. I don't believe this qualifies for G4 as it is not substantially identical to the version deleted at AFD (I should know I've deleted a few versions in the interim!). If someone really thinks it should be deleted then I would suggest that a new AFD is now in order. Cheers, Nancy  talk  18:28, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Please cross-check
I request administrators not to blindly delete this article, as this article is requested by many users, and all fans of Miss Pooja really want to see her here. This was deleted previously as, at that time references were mostly from blogs and forums. Now the article is in prefect order. Does not make sense now to delete this article. Quality check 19:14, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Revisions restored
Per discussion with the admin that deleted the last "proper" version of the article, those revisions have been restored as it is no longer substantially identical to the article deleted at AFD. Nancy talk  19:56, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Edit request on 3 January 2012
Dil Mera Gaya Lutiya 2.121.223.109 (talk) 14:09, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Not a request-- Jac 16888 Talk 14:19, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Birth date
Which site is to be trusted? — Wbm1058 (talk) 15:06, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
 * http://themisspooja.com/about says 1980
 * http://www.misspooja.org/ says 1979


 * The first page is down now.. The second one contains a list of 192 porn page links.... 2001:4091:A247:8008:F80C:FCA2:6BA8:1B87 (talk) 23:32, 5 May 2023 (UTC)