Talk:Mohsin Naqvi

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:53, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Mohsin Raza Naqvi.jpg

Why are we edit warring on this page with no discussion?
This morning I semi-protected this page for two days on the good faith report of one contributor at WP:RFPP. I'm taking no sides as to why there is dispute, and I'm not assigning myself responsibility to resolve page issues, but as the protecting admin, I'm inviting all who disagree to make their case here and I will offer to keep order if agreed. For those thinking this is a vandalism issue, please restrain such allegations; my reading of the edit summaries by blankers is that these blanked sections might reasonably be considered attacks on a BLP with inadequate sourcing (BLP attacks subject to immediate blanking by any editor, summary blanking explicitly permitted under BLP policy). I am not myself so assessing; I am sufficiently persuaded of the possibility the blankers might have a BLP case (which I urge them to make) that I suggested to the RfPP reporter this talk thread might prove useful. If I am mistaken to give these blankers such a say, someone please trout me appropriately. Otherwise, please discuss in a civil manner, which is my entire motivation in commencing this thread BusterD (talk) 23:49, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
 * BusterD, I've been reaching out to the users who are attempting to blank this BLP on their user tp's (User talk:Hasan Ul Hasan and User talk:110.39.150.58). But their concerns don't hold water. The information in this BLP is well-sourced and definitely not libelous, despite what they're claiming. — Saqib (talk) 04:07, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Yours is the consensus, Saqib, being the status quo position, the current page wording, and the only defended assertion in this discussion to date. Thank you for notifying relevant contributors and linking them here. If none of them shows up to assert BLP with a reasonable case, you may safely call such assertions by those editors mere vandalism. For now, let's extend our good faith. We should always err on the side of "first do no harm" when we're dealing with living subjects. BusterD (talk) 15:24, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Requested move 3 July 2024

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: page moved. — Saqib  ( talk  I  contribs ) 11:33, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

– Reliable references mostly refer to him as Mohsin Naqvi, not by his full name. Ngram-style evidence from major reliable references is given below:
 * Mohsin Raza Naqvi → Mohsin Naqvi
 * Mohsin Naqvi → Mohsin Naqvi (poet)
 * AP News - no mention using his full name
 * Reuters - no mention using his full name
 * DAWN
 * The News International
 * The Express Tribune

The obscure poet is likely non-notable and is cleary not the primary topic. 213.89.196.212 (talk) 10:33, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Absolutely, it makes sense, so consider it ✅— Saqib  ( talk  I  contribs ) 11:24, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. You want me to re-open this discussion? --— Saqib  ( talk  I  contribs ) 07:42, 5 July 2024 (UTC)


 * My bad, no. Titan2456 (talk) 15:42, 5 July 2024 (UTC)