Talk:Mongoloid

Someone provide a source for the following line
"With the rise of modern genetics, the concept of distinct human races in a biological sense has become obsolete." this claim has no citation, and is standalone. I attempted to remove it, but an administrator got offended and warned me and reverted the eidt, probably because he was unable to provide a source for the claim.

if you know of a reliable citation for it, please add it. I know of none.Kewlkha (talk) 21:36, 26 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Did you check the reference mentioned by Doug Weller in his edit summary? Please omit the dudgeon next time.  Acroterion   (talk)   23:18, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Agree, it's referenced to this which is already linked from the article. -- Euryalus (talk) 23:30, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Biological races in humans. Alan R.Templeton. Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences Volume 44, Issue 3, September 2013, Pages 262-271 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2013.04.010.  Moxy -Maple Leaf (Pantone).svg 02:24, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
 * thanks. you were warned before for the same edit.  Doug Weller  talk 06:48, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

no it was a different edit same page. you are mistakenKewlkha (talk) 14:30, 28 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Compromise: While it was not exactly the same edit, it wasn't different, either. Both edits removed the word "obsolete", both had a wrong edit summary (yes, correct representation of results of science is not "biased language"), both broke the logical consistency of the lead section, both were pro-fringe. --Rsk6400 (talk) 15:30, 28 October 2021 (UTC)