Talk:More danico
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Too pro-form[edit]
This Wikiarticle ain't written right. The prologue is quite good, but from there on, it's much too technical in the historical sciences, and pro forma, pre-anything. It doesn't ring right at *all*. It needs to be rewritten in toto. Decoy (talk) 19:00, 10 May 2022 (UTC)