Talk:Mount Ecclesia

Quotefarm, POV, peacock, primarysources tags
This article has multiple issues:


 * There are too many quotes; at first glance, it appears about 50% of the article is quotes.
 * It is written from the Rosicrucian viewpoint, with no balance of how others may view the site.
 * It uses many peacock terms which add no objective meaning; "picturesque", "faithfully", "this holy place", "consecrated their lives to this work", etc., etc..
 * Apart from geographical data, all references and external links are to Rosicrucian resources, which are considered primary sources in this context. Reliable secondary sources, and the POV balance they will bring to the content, are needed.

I could imagine this article being given out as a glossy brochure to visitors to the site, which is not appropriate for a Wikipedia article. --Rogerb67 (talk) 00:23, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
 * This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
 * There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
 * It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
 * In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:27, 22 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Agree and removed remaining issues flags/templates after a "face-lifting" of the article/existing contents. Thanks! ~ --109.51.208.181 (talk) 16:05, 4 February 2017 (UTC)