Talk:Moymirid dynasty

[Untitled]
What is 'wrong' with giving information in the title, as well as in the body? You and everyone else do it all of the time, all over the project! And then to block reversion. This is what I mean by writers feeling that they have far too proprietary rule over what is published, (i.e.: made public). Perhaps Wikipedia ought simply to make all articles uneditable. That is what I see happening. Authors can not let go of even atrocious grammar, or wrong use of 'their', 'there' and 'they're'. Or 'your' and 'you're'. Or 'yore'. Or 'AIDS', 'aide', 'aides', 'aid' or 'aids'. Or think that 'I could care less!' means exactly: 'I couldn't care less'. Or flipping the simple past tense with the perfect tenses. These are signs of idiocy, or under-education, NOT literary style or sophistication. Why does Wikipedia even make editing possible if the article authors don't/won't allow it? And why does Wikiworld tell me that I need to talk about edits if no-one else has the courtesy so to do with me? Can anyone say 'Double Standard'? SMOMMSS (talk) 23:33, 4 August 2020 (UTC) my sources are personal experience.