Talk:Mr. Majestic

Majestic Creators
I know jim lee had a hand in creating Mr. Majestic, but I don't believe brandon choi did anything (thusly I edited his name out of the article, to be added later if im wrong). In issue #11 of the orginal wildcats, Majestic first appeared in a backup story written by H.K. proger. The main story in the issue was by Chris Claremont. Is there any proof Choi even had any connection to the characters creation? Midusunknown 10:21, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

At the very beginning, the main wiki entry says he first appeared in Wildcats #12 - shouldn't it say #11? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Camera73 (talk • contribs) 14:32, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * His name was first mentioned in #11, but he didn't appear on panel until #12. ChimpZealot (talk) 04:05, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Most Powerful?
Labelling Majestic "the" most powerful, as opposed to "one of the" most powerful, is a little bit uncertain. At the very least, the Doctor is arguably a peer in capability ( unless you don't consider him a genuine hero; putting that condition in play *really* narrows the pool. . . ). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.22.249.3 (talk) 17:15, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree. --Strannik 22:21, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Expert
Someone who is an expert on this character, please spend some time on this article. Thanks in advance. Lots42 21:49, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Suggestion for improvement
If anyone has access to the issue, a brief summary of Majestic being one of the last survivors of all time and space would be a neat addition to the article. Lots42 05:48, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Cleanup done

 * I've done some major clean-up of the article; it started out as just removing past tense references, but quickly took on a larger aspect. I removed a lot of text that was redundant or not really part of the article subject. I also added a lot of cn tags (which do not challenge the accuracy of the information, but merely need anchoring within the continuity); they should not be removed without properly cited references.
 * I think that the article still needs a lot of trimming. Someone should clear up the interchangeability/operability of using Mr. Majestic. Majestic and Magestros in the article. As I ma not intimately familiar with the comics, i found the use of different names a bit confusing. - Arcayne   (cast a spell)  22:19, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Excess of "Citation needed"
Does anyone know why there are "Citation needed" signs all over this article? Some appear at points where a footnote in the bibliography would be nice, but many of them seem to be next to just random words. I've tried editing this out three times, but it keeps bouncing back. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jrpelt (talk • contribs) 00:56, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Majestic02.jpg
Image:Majestic02.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 14:59, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Worldstorm And Beyond
The phrase, "Apparently Majestic was able to escape the closed loop shown in his third series," is inaccurate. When Majestic destroyed the Bleed portal after being sent back in time, the Daemonites never took over Earth, thus the second Majestic, shown arriving at the end of the series, would not have to go back in time to close the portal. Once he rescued humanity from the ark, time could move forward without change. Is it okay if I take that sentence out of the article? Thanks. turbov21 —Preceding undated comment was added at 17:45, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I had meant to look through my issues again because I thought that line was incorrect, but you're right so I'll remove it. - ChimpZealot (talk) 02:06, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks! turbov21 —Preceding undated comment was added at 00:15, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Requested move 25 October 2019

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) comrade waddie96 ★ (talk)  09:55, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Mister Majestic → Mr. Majestic – The subject is consistently referred to as Mr. Majestic within the article, the title was moved to the full word "Mister" in 2006 with no explanation and I'm not entirely sure why.  Lazz _R  01:11, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Support Red   Slash  13:37, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Support per nomination and Red Slash. The title, as depicted in the image of the cover appended to the infobox, should provide sufficient confirmation. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 00:15, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Which, I note, actually refers to him as Mr Majestic with no full stop! -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:27, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 19:07, 28 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.