Talk:Murder of Laura Ann Carleton

This is not wikipedia worthy
The only reason that an article exists is because of the pride-flag. And, the leftist bias on wikipedia wants to use this death as anecdotal evidence for propaganda. 24.57.55.50 (talk) 12:20, 21 August 2023 (UTC)


 * A murder is notable and moreso for Wikipedia if it garners significant media coverage, as this one did. You're probably upset because you identify with the values of the terrorist shooter. I understand, but your subjective impressions don't inform Wiki policy. Peleio Aquiles (talk) 12:27, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Exactly. В²C ☎ 19:08, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
 * hi projection, may i introduce you to a mirror? right for the ad hominem because you cannot defend your view point ... let alone the existence of this abject lie of an article. the problem is that you see your hypocrisy not as a moral and intellectual failure but as proof of your virtue, because you are certain that you are good and "they" are bad. quite the opposite, my friend. but you will never know. 67.250.36.214 (talk) 09:04, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Story is definitely notable, especially due to international coverage. 72.14.126.22 (talk) 04:56, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
 * 🥱 B3251 (talk) 05:07, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
 * i agree, this is pure propaganda. linking it to the "anti-lgbt" article, itself an abject lie, is a dead give away. wikipedia's bias is truly out of control. you people have zero scruples. 67.250.36.214 (talk) 08:59, 27 June 2024 (UTC)