Talk:NATO/GA2

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

This article contains over 20 unaddressed citation needed tags, and thus likely fails criterion 1b, which requires citations for statistics and challenged material. I will wait a week before closing this reassessment so editors can have the opportunity to fix these issues.--FutureTrillionaire (talk) 14:00, 1 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Right, I added many of these citation needed tags last week, and can do some research to see what can be covered myself, but was hoping one of the more military-minded editors might have sources on hand.-- Patrick, o Ѻ ∞ 18:38, 1 September 2013 (UTC)


 * I did the referencing tonight, but if you feel up to reviewing other parts of the article, feel free!-- Patrick, o Ѻ ∞ 01:51, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Nice job! Give me some time to check the article to see if there are any more issues that need to be resolved.--FutureTrillionaire (talk) 19:44, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: Kept. The issues I brought up have been addressed. I don't see anymore issues with the article.--FutureTrillionaire (talk) 17:49, 6 September 2013 (UTC)