Talk:NK Zagreb

External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on NK Zagreb. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141029171326/http://www.nkzagreb.hr/main.asp?dir=oklubu&vijestid=15 to http://www.nkzagreb.hr/main.asp?dir=oklubu&vijestid=15
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070804070623/http://www.bijeliandjeli.hr/ to http://www.bijeliandjeli.hr/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:05, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

PNIŠK misconception
I just added title PNIŠK misconception to article in section History. It is due to wrong information about foundation of the club, which roots lies in the 90s, short story, in newly formed state of Croatia, it was not desirable to have connections with the communist or non-Croatian heritage, both in politics, life and in sports, so many clubs, as well as football, rediscovered their "true" roots, in the sense - the older the better. This is also the case with Zagreb - PNIŠK, which have no connection with each other except the name Zagreb. PNIŠK, with the football section formed in 1903, very soon ceased to operate in 1909. But myth was accepted as general knowledge.

I am interested in what the next step is, deleting that segment, how, what with the written text that does not have its own page in English (there is a page in Croatian), how to prove the claim, what are the rules, etc.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PeaceDefender (talk • contribs) 19:49, 26 June 2022 (UTC)