Talk:Nabanna

Proposed deletion (2007)
why should the article be deleted ? it also links up with several articles? was it a bot which marked it for deletion ? then the bot should take into account the on going edit process can be very jerky. I just created the title and then I was adding my research. It does not make sense. The article should not be deleted. Jeroje 17:17, 23 July 2007 (UTC)jeroje

still working on it Jeroje 17:28, 23 July 2007 (UTC)jeroje

Merger proposal
Editor proposed on 16 February 2016 that Navanna be merged into Nabanna. This talk section has been created to facilitate any discussion. Worldbruce (talk) 05:56, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Navanna is a copyright violation of Banglapedia, and has been since it was created, so it is being speedily deleted. That makes the proposed merger moot, but it would be great if someone expanded this article with information from Navanna's sources (which I've copied into a "Further reading" section in this article). Worldbruce (talk) 06:23, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nabanna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071021104436/http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl1812/18120800.htm to http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl1812/18120800.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:04, 11 February 2018 (UTC)