Talk:Nana Komatsu

Requested move 19 September 2016

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Moved &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 13:47, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Nana Komatsu (actress) → Nana Komatsu – Actress is famous more than character in manga Nana Kanghuitari (talk) 03:11, 19 September 2016 (UTC) --Relisting. &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 11:30, 26 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Oppose Actress is not primary topic. The character from Nana has been around much longer and been in the anime series and multiple live-action movies. Article does not even explain why the live-action Komatsu is famous. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 06:34, 19 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Support the character is not even notable enough for its own article. A hatnote on top of the person's article pointing to the "List of characters" article is sufficient. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 02:26, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Support the actress has a standalone article, unlike the character.--Prisencolin (talk) 21:05, 26 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Oppose – the existence of an article is not very good support for the primarytopic claim. The character may very well be about equally or more prominent. Dicklyon (talk) 02:55, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I think it is worth having a link to the about the character before it was redirected in 2013. 1,700 words without a suggestion of notability. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 03:13, 27 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Support - The actress receives four time the page views of not only the Nana Komatsu (Nana) redirect, but the List of Nana characters article it points to.|Nana_Komatsu_(Nana)|List_of_Nana_characters And of course not all readers going to that article are looking for "Nana Komatsu". The actress is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC in a WP:TWODABS situation. The character can be linked in a hat note as effectively as from a dab page.--Cúchullain t/ c 19:52, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Support per Cuchullain. This appears to be the clear primary topic. Nohomersryan (talk) 20:52, 3 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Hey, How are you?
Your smile so cute     🥶 103.236.107.159 (talk) 19:53, 19 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Nedd your whatsapp number
 * And Remember this the shifat Boy are too hacked 36.50.11.141 (talk) 14:38, 5 May 2024 (UTC)