Talk:Nanoracks CubeSat Deployer

October 2014
The dimensions should be metric as this is what the cubesat specification is defined in.

Launchers: P-POD vs. NanoRack
The original launcher in the ISS is thwe P-POD, which should be mentioned here. From the CubeSat page: "P-PODs have deployed over 90% of all CubeSats launched to date, and 100% of all CubeSats launched since 2006."

So it looks like both articles need an update. Cheers, BatteryIncluded (talk) 19:43, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on NanoRacks CubeSat Deployer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140714131739/http://www.spaceflight101.com/cygnus-orb-2-cargo-manifest.html to http://www.spaceflight101.com/cygnus-orb-2-cargo-manifest.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 18:42, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on NanoRacks CubeSat Deployer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130607021136/http://www.kosmonautai.lt/en/ to http://www.kosmonautai.lt/en/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:47, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Apparent copy-pasting
The section "NRCSD technical details" appears to have been directly copied by the article creator. It also looks like they wrote most of the rest of the article, but nothing else stands out as clearly copied. However, they cited (reference 7) a technical document from the company that's no longer publicly accessible, so I have concerns. In further weirdness, NanoRacks paid a different user to edit their main page, so they might be okay with it. I need an adult. Noophilic (talk) 00:12, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://nanoracks.com/products/iss-cubesat-deployment/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 16:01, 25 May 2019 (UTC)