Talk:Naoko Ogigami

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): BeeHime. Peer reviewers: AmeliaDM.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:24, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Hellotrickster. Peer reviewers: Stereoscope123, QueenArtemisia.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:24, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Peer Review
This article has all the major content relevant to a director. The information on her early life and education is brief, but relevant. The career section is informative and unbiased. The information provided is well researched and doesn't persuade readers to believe one thing or the other. The contributor provides the facts in organized manner, the information follows the directors career in chronological order. The inclusion of the 'style' section is important, it provides information that differentiates this director from others. It provides notability and relevance to her directing. The Filmography and Awards section needs more links for the projects and awards listed. Overall, a solid entry.

QueenArtemisia (talk) 06:29, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Peer Review
Stereoscope123 (talk) 17:19, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Great article overall. I made some changes to the formatting, and I tidied up some of the grammar. You often referred to the director as "she" as opposed to Ogigami, so I changed that sometimes as well just to make it sound smoother and more professional. You might want to expand on her style; you say she is different from a lot of other Japanese filmmakers - how? If you have any more information about her education that might be of interest too.

Peer Review
This is a very strong article. I feel like I was given all the relevant information about the director. I especially liked how you included the steps she took towards her career (school, etc.) rather than just jumping into her films. I also liked the section on her style. I wouldn't repeat the quote you used in the introduction, it's not necessary to read it twice. It would also be interesting to have a section on her personal life, if you have any relevant information about that. I enjoy gaining insight into a filmmaker's background in order to see how they got to where they are today.

--AmeliaDM (talk) 18:10, 12 March 2016 (UTC)