Talk:Naomi Jaffe

Untitled
This paper wasa bit spotty in places and could have connected better. The content was good and the grammar was excellent. I feel that the paper is well written but perhaps a few minor changes could take placeBlund4 (talk) 02:15, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Comment: The biography was assembled very well and was very informative. There was not much public information available on the subject, so the information that the user was able to present is much appreciated. If there was a little more information on her involvement with WITCH, that would be a great, but not necessary, just an added bonus!Tjcjaj (talk) 04:20, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Comment: The internal link to *Osawatomie* might be reconsidered, since it does not take the reader to information regarding this particular publication. Alternatively, if the intent of the link is to provide the reader with the logic behind the publication's name, then the wording might signal that a bit more explicitly to the reader.--Historytrain (talk) 17:49, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Comment: I fixed the Osawatomie link to be an external link to their last issue of the publication.(It goes directly to the Osawatomie publication.) I did that just so people had a place to go and look at the publication if they wanted to. You can take it off if you want to, it doesn't really add much but at least someone can link directly to it if they needed.Tjcjaj (talk) 07:06, 30 November 2007 (UTC)69.91.208.67 (talk) 05:08, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Comment: I am the subject of this bio. I am new as a Wikipedia user. I am in awe that someone has taken the time to write a thorough and well-researched article, using (except for the FBI!) pretty reliable sources. The article is overall fairly accurate. I have made a couple of edits for accuracy. (1) I have deleted a sentence that referred to FBI files which say I claim to have participated in shooting down a US plane when I was in Hanoi. The FBI files do say this; however, it is untrue that I have ever made such a claim and the FBI files offer no evidence (because there is none) to substantiate this charge. (2) I have added the information that conspiracy charges against me and other Weather Underground members were dropped, and provided a reference for the new information. (3) I have corrected the title of an article written by me and Bernardine Dohrn, and changed the reference from one that mentions the article by an incorrect title (Jacobs) to one that provides the full text of the article and its correct title (Teodori). (4) I have made some minor spelling and grammar edits. I believe these changes are all more or less non-controversial. Please let me know if I have made the edits correctly and if they are legitimate edits. Oops, I forgot to log on.Naomi643 (talk) 12:15, 4 June 2008 (UTC) 72.231.155.90 (talk) 12:07, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

I think any links to corporations such as google should be revised. There's no need to send viewers to places that are antithetical to the subject. If you have to link do it small bookstores that support Women, feminism, the left! Hesweeney (talk) 03:09, 28 February 2021 (UTC)