Talk:Nathan Yau

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (Here's a credible claim of significance and importance of Nathan Yau stating this article does not fall under Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, in particular A7. The article does attribute noteworthiness to the subject by stating that he won two widely recognized awards - Dataviz Website award at Kantar Information is Beautiful Awards for his blog FlowingData and Graphic Design & Data Visualization award at Fast Company's Innovation by Design Awards for a data visualization project series he had created. Relevant references are initially provided in the article. Yau's personal blog is featured manywhere among top and best data visualization blogs; some examples can be found in the article sources. The article also says the subject is one of the Best American Infographics Brain Trust as treated by Gareth Cook with other significant and notable subjects and wrote books notably presented and referenced by experts including in relevant notable sources. Please consider removing the tag speedy deletion nomination of Nathan Yau. Thank you.) --Avbgok (talk) 12:57, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Just to confirm the issue is now resolved and the tag has been removed by Interstellarity, and ZaaraTE who initially inserted the tag agreed that the article does not meet A7 and that the tag be removed. Thank you. Avbgok (talk) 14:57, 7 December 2019 (UTC)