Talk:National anthem of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan

Orphaned references in National anthem of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of National anthem of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "info": From Hai Tanahku Papua:  From Anthem of the Kazakh Soviet Socialist Republic: Kazakhstan (1945-1992), NationalAnthems.info, 2013. Kendall, David. 

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:54, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

De facto/de jure
I added in the qualifier on the basis that this anthem is still internationally recognised (e.g. played at sporting events) so it remains the de jure anthem. Please further explain your reversion. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 00:15, 8 May 2022 (UTC)


 * While the usurpation of power by the Taliban was unlawful, it does not invalidate their administrative rulings – laws and decrees issued by the Taliban administration are still binding locally and recognised internationally. This is perfectly normal. If you need an example, birth and marriage certificates as well as passports issued by the Taliban administration are recognised internationally.
 * The fact that many countries chose not to maintain diplomatic relations with the Taliban and play other anthems is irrelevant here. — kashmīrī  TALK  05:05, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
 * That is somewhat irrelevant, as the Taliban has continued to issue documents baring the name of the Islamic Republic. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 10:35, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
 * The look of a document is irrelevant, because it's only a technicality (inability to get new booklets printed abroad). What's important is that the Taliban's decrees are law and are recognised as such both in and out of Afghanistan.
 * Similarly, even though many countries do not recognise the outcome of the last presidential elections in Belarus, the legality and binding power of various Belarussian acts of law passed since the 2020 is not questioned. — kashmīrī  TALK  11:19, 8 May 2022 (UTC)