Talk:Neorion at Samothrace

I have a couple of suggestions for your article. Under "Location and Materials" you say the date range, which is more fitting in the intro when you are stating the basics of the Neorion. Also under "Location and Materials", you feature a lot of really good information about the architecture of the Neorion, which could use its own section and not just get lumped in with location and materials. Agonzalez23 (talk) 19:35, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Review
Hi Jacob!

Great Article so far! Keep up the good work!

Robert Y. Rob6820 (talk) 00:47, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Comments from Prof. Paga
Hi Jacob - this is a solid article! Your placeholders for hyperlinks are good and will help integrate your article into Wikipedia. In addition to your peer-reviewer comments, here are a few suggestions of my own. Jpaga (talk) 20:35, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Consider including a map of Greece showing where Samothrace is located.
 * You mention the "temple complex" several times, but this is inaccurate. It's a sanctuary.  (It has a temple in it, but it's relatively far away from the Neorion itself.)
 * In the "Description" section, it would be a good idea to create subsections for "Location," "Materials," "Size," and perhaps "Remains" (indicate what survives of the monument).